How To Choose A DAW: 7 Of The Best DAWs For Every Musical Need

This post originally appeared on Flypaper by our friends at Soundfly.

Whether you’re working out of a home studio or a small project studio, your Digital Audio Workstation (or, DAW) is probably the single most important part of your setup. It’s the bridge of your musical Starship Enterprise, containing and co-ordinating all the software and hardware you use to create and communicate each of your decisions. It’s no surprise then, that much like the fights that people have over Nintendo/Xbox/Playstation or iOS/Android, the world of audio production is rife with software fan service and forum flame wars (harmless, of course, but they can be quite harsh!)…

internetvsreality

Part of my job is to help you cut through all the post-truth out there and make the right choice for you about where to lay your precious tracks. In the interest of doing just that, I’m going to deal with a controversial point straight up: There is very little, if anything, that differentiates DAWs in terms of pure sound quality. Without diving deep into the complex, fascinating, and heady science of signal processing, all major recording software is now able to sample using at least 32-bit floating point calculations. If you’re really interested in this (and why wouldn’t you be?) this article is a great introduction to the science behind this topic. But basically, any DAW you choose will deliver the same audio transparency and clarity.

Join ReverbNation for Free

The quality of your mix will come down what you put into the DAW; which is why making the right choice for you is so important. Just like there’s no guitar that will suit all guitarists, there’s no platform that will be right for every producer. It’s about choosing the one with the workflow and atmosphere that makes you feel at home and gets your songs where they need to be. I’ve tried a bunch of DAWs in my time and I’m always looking for a cool new thing. The reality is that it’s hard to be a jack-of-all-trades with recording software. At some point you need to dive in a build a relationship with your DAW, mastering its peculiar perks and quirks.

I should disclose that I’m deep in a ten-year love/hate relationship with Ableton Live (I teach the free Live Clicks and Backing Tracks course on Soundfly on how to use Ableton for on-stage electronic syncing and processing). I’m also friendly with REAPER, suspicious of Pro Tools, and really intrigued by Logic Pro X and Studio One 3. What follows is one muso trying to be fair and fun about a topic that’s full of myths, tribalism, and a bit too much seriousness. Not every DAW on the planet is mentioned here, so feel free to add your preferred programs in the comments below! Onwards, upwards, and in no particular order:

GarageBand

Arguably the most popular DAW ever created, GarageBand comes free with every Macintosh computer and boasts a simple, clean interface. The last couple of versions have seen GarageBand come to resemble a diet version of Apple’s flagship DAW, Logic (discussed below). It’s both loved for its simplicity and loathed for its limitations. Case in point: Claire Boucher, also known as Grimes, recorded her breakthrough album Visions using nothing but GarageBand. That is, before later renouncing the platform as far too limited.

choosing a daw: garageband

Pros

Simplicity is the major selling point here. GarageBand takes the complex world of music production and streamlines it into a basic, welcoming package with a gentle learning curve. There’s enough in the way of beats, drum samplers, software instruments, and effects to keep one occupied for a while. The simplicity of the software also means work happens quickly. You can hear basic results immediately, enjoy the vibe, and keep working.

Oh, and it’s free.

Cons

The counterbalance of simplicity is limitation, so GarageBand’s strength is also its weakness. The possibilities for complex routing, sound design, and audio problem-solving that are common in other DAWs are simply not present here. You’re most likely to hit these walls in the mixing stage, or when trying to complete a finicky task (such as programming a detailed drum part or completing a track that requires a great deal of automation).

choosing a daw: garageband

What It’s Best At

GarageBand can get you where you need to be quickly. Where a fast, simple, and no-frills solution is called for (and maybe one that also works on your iPhone), GarageBand is going to deliver the goods. It did for Rihanna with “Umbrella,” and for the demos that got Cloud Nothings signed to labels.

Ideal User

It’s ideal for beginners looking to dive into the world of audio recording, or established artists who are looking to get ideas down fast. It’s the 4-track of the 21st century.

Logic Pro

If GarageBand is the Ikea of the audio production world, where you can buy a door that will lock and keep the elements out for cheap, then Logic Pro is a boutique furniture store in the nice part of town where you can buy a nice stained-wood deal with Tiffany glass that will make the neighbors a little jealous. Seriously though — Apple’s flagship DAW is a major player in the market, and with good reason. In essence, it takes the best of GarageBand, but unleashes it from the burden of limitations, and is the base platform for many professional studios.

choosing a daw: logic pro 2

Pros

You get that classic Apple design aesthetic: clean, simple, accessible. Yet there’s a good deal of grunt under the hood. You’ll find audio editing and recording capabilities comparable to any other product on the market, and then some. Logic aficionados that I’ve spoken with are particularly enamored with the MIDI editing capabilities, regarded alongside Cubase and Ableton Live as some of the best around. Along these lines, Logic comes bundled with a diverse array of quality synths, sample instruments, and studio-grade effects out of the box.

I find that many DAWs offer an emphasis on either MIDI and synth capacity, or on recording and audio editing strength. Logic strikes the balance between the two very well, offering many options to both new users and recording vets. At around $300 in the Apple App Store, it’s not exactly cheap, but it is relatively good value for money considering what you get in one package.

choosing a daw: logic pro 2

Cons

Mostly minor issues — the audio editing probably isn’t quite as strong as you’d find in Pro Tools, and the workflow is not really customizable the way it is in REAPER. Your mileage may vary regarding the bundled sounds as well. As a guitarist and a prog-rock aficionado, I find the bundled amp sims to be underwhelming, but I do really appreciate easy access to a Mellotron.

While it’s hard to state any major flaws, I was irked by the lack of a demo capability for the program. Since being attuned to the workflow of a program is such a big deal, this is mildly unforgivable. Yes, it’s possible to pirate the software to try before buying, but that shouldn’t be necessary. Somehow, I doubt Apple are losing sleep over this though…

What It’s Best At

Logic works as a comprehensive and super-slick complete package, covering all the bases of modern music production with style and aplomb. When I use Logic, I have the feeling that the sound or instrument I need in any given moment is at my fingertips. Contrast with something like REAPER, which is more open-ended, but will need more investment from the user regarding sample libraries and plugins.

choosing a daw: logic pro 2

Ideal User

Logic is undoubtedly professional-grade and fits in easily in a studio setting. Yet a determined amateur could certainly justify the price tag, especially if they were looking to create music that combined recorded and synthesized elements on a frequent basis, and it’s a great foundation for home recording (it’s the recommended DAW in Soundfly’s free course Demo Recording 101). And if you’ve been cutting your teeth on GarageBand and are ready for the next step, but don’t want to start learning a new piece of technology from scratch, Logic is the obvious answer.

Ableton Live

Ableton Live is a bit of an enigma, and was definitely a game-changer when it emerged from Berlin in 2001. Designed primarily for use on-stage, it’s nonetheless the studio DAW of choice for a growing and loyal base of musicians. It’s been built primarily for DJs and electronic musicians, but there’s enough pure audio capability in there to keep it nipping at the heels of the other big-name DAWs. More and more these days, it’s being trusted by all types of musicians to create both electronic and acoustic tracks. (We’ve created an ongoing series of courses that teaches you how to use Ableton Live to build entire tracks out of found sounds and audio samples. It’s called Any Sound Will Do, and current courses are taught by YouTube star Andrew Huang and Ableton Certified Trainer Brian Jackson.)

An excerpt from Soundfly’s free course Capturing and Warping Samples in Ableton Live

Pros

The interface, first and foremost. It’s clean and simple, but unlike Apple’s aesthetic, Live’s layout feels designed to enhance workflow. You can work in the standard, linear Arrangement view, or jam a song out as “loops” and “scenes“ by flipping to the cubic Session view with a button tap. Another big plus are the effects and instruments Live comes bundled with. Like many other DAWs, they sound great, but they also go a step further by integrating into the program’s interface and workflow in surprising ways.

choosing a daw: ableton live

Finally, Ableton is an innovator in blue-chip musical ideas. Push is a touch-based hardware interface that makes the program hands-on and intuitive. Link can wirelessly sync two machines running Live to the same time-clock, running them in tandem. MAX for Live takes the MAX/MSP programming architecture and integrates it within the program, basically open-sourcing development of new plugins and program workarounds.

Cons

The audio capabilities leave quite a lot to be desired compared to other programs, a hangover from the program’s origins as a DJ tool. You can track stuff, sure, but you’ll run into headaches if you want to edit, comp, and mix a rock band like a pro in this setting.

Automation is a bugbear of mine with Live. If you’re tweaking physical knobs or faders on your synth or your MIDI controller, you’ll be fine. But the inability to manually click and type a value on a point is a glaring oversight that should have been remedied years ago.

choosing a daw: ableton live

What It’s Best At

It’s a truly immersive creative experience, unique and open-ended. Live is rock-solid on stage and shines as a songwriting tool. It also has the feeling of being more like an actual instrument than other DAWs, which is why tons of artists use it live on-stage to expand the electronic capabilities of their instruments. It’s hard to put into words until you try it.

Ideal User

Electronic musicians, first and foremost. But film composers, rock musicians, pretty much anyone can create great music from start to end with Live. It depends if it’s unique approach feels good to you.

REAPER

Just over 10 years old, REAPER was started by the same dude who created Winamp (remember that from the days of Napster?). It’s got humble beginnings and a humble price tag, but it’s been created to compete with the big players and boasts a devoted community and passionate development team, both focused on continuous improvement. Flexibility and stability are mainstays of the program — the man behind Tycho, Scott Hansen, uses it in both recording and live performance.

choosing a daw: REAPER

Pros

First up, the price tag. After a full-featured 60-day evaluation period, a full personal license is only $60. Those who appreciate detail and customization will have a field day with this program. The audio routing is incredibly powerful, allowing for complex bussing and sub-mixing. The cutting and editing of audio is powerful and streamlined, and the built-in REAPER effects are all usable (albeit no-frills). On top of this, the program is eminently skin-able and scriptable, with fully customizable commands and hot keys. Out of all the programs listed here, this is one you can really make your own.

Cons

While Tycho claims to have taught himself REAPER in a week, it may have been one loooong week. It can be hard to wrap your head around REAPER at first, as there is so much going on. The manual is thick, detailed, and daunting. For some people, this is just what they want, but for others the depth is going to be intimidating and off-putting. You’ll either need a bit of experience with friendlier DAWs or time to learn the ropes before you jump in.

What It’s Best At

Functioning as a very cheap, uncompromising rival to Pro Tools, Cubase, and the like. By combining a quality feature set with a low price point, REAPER makes a strong case as the mainstay DAW for a small studio.

Secondly, if you’re into multi-channel audio work and VR sound design, with REAPER’s free Ambisonic Toolkit plugin, you’ll be able to make 360° ambisonic sound design with little to no technical obstacles or learning curve.

choosing a daw: REAPER

Ideal User

Someone who is serious about audio production and getting pro-quality results, but can’t afford to shell out the oodles required for a big-budget product. Or someone like me who wants to have their computer recording package look like an old analog console. So cool.

Read more on Flypaper: “Ten Tips for Creating More Realistic MIDI Music”

Pro Tools

The undeniable industry standard, Pro Tools is the lumbering DAW behemoth by which everything else is judged. It’s been designed from the ground up to be the standard for large commercial recording studios and media production houses, and with a vintage of 27 years, it’s definitely had time to establish its majority market share. Many swear by it, but in past years it’s come under criticism for perceived issues with creative workflow and the strict licensing and commercial practices of its parent company, Avid.

choosing a daw: pro tools

Pros

Pro Tools was designed from the ground up to work with rack-mounted studio gear, large mix consoles, and complex patch routings. If your aim is to work with these kinds of things, there’s a lot of capability here to help you. As Pro Tools pioneered many innovations in non-destructive editing, take-comping, and bus-routing, there’s serious depth below the surface. From a pure audio recording and manipulation standpoint, it’s hard to beat.

There’s also the question of hardware. Avid has created a whole line of audio hardware — from consumer-grade interfaces to the highest pro-quality desks — designed to work specifically with Pro Tools. If you love the program and can afford the hefty prices, this could be seen as a long-term investment in your career.

choosing a daw: pro tools

Cons

Not only is “dongle” a silly word, it’s also an annoying device you have to plug into your USB slot to make Pro Tools work at all. It’s an indication of the kind of tight control Avid place on their propriety software. And while the audio capabilities are top-notch, people who like to work with VSTis are going to find the MIDI interface endlessly frustrating.

choosing a daw: pro tools

What It’s Best At

A perfect recipe of editing and mixing solutions, tailored to perfection over a generation.

Ideal User

If you know Pro Tools, then you know how to walk into just about any professional music facility in the world and work the desk. If that’s your goal, then you need to familiarize yourself with this program. All indications are that it’s not going anywhere soon.

Cubase 8.5

Cubase has been around in some form since 1989. Along the way, their parent company Steinberg has been responsible for some DAW innovations and concepts, like VST plugin architecture, that have been widely adopted in the industry. Cubase 8.5, accordingly, is a bit like Logic Pro X — doing a bit of everything quite well — but with its own feel and flavor.

choosing a daw: cubase 8.5

Pros

Cubase is the MVP on your production team. It can handle pro-level audio and mixing work in a similar fashion to Pro Tools, but has also invested significant effort over the past few releases to balance that with a pretty sweet creative workflow. The MIDI and plugin capabilities of Cubase are second to none, making it a really good choice for musos who want to explore both their compositional and engineering sides. There’s even some pretty strong notation capabilities that make it a solid candidate for orchestration, transcription, and film composition. One of the most interesting features of Cubase 8.5 is their new cloud collaboration service, built specifically to handle long-distance collaborative projects, including the sharing of plugins via a service called VST Transit.

Cons

Compared to Logic Pro X, which is similarly featured, Cubase is the more expensive option. On the other hand, unlike Logic, Cubase has a try-before-you-buy option so you can see if it feels right for you.

Normally I try to be objective and find a couple of significant program faults, but it’s quite hard to pick holes in Cubase. It truly is a comprehensive and well-rounded solution. Its long heritage has meant that the major kinks have been ironed out, but Steinberg have also endeavored to stay on the leading edge, lest their product stagnate.

What It’s Best At

A tried and true DAW that can handle pretty much anything you throw at it.

Ideal User

Almost anyone who wants depth, flexibility, and stability in their platform and is willing to pay for it.

Studio One

The new kid on the block, Studio One is made by audio hardware manufacturer PreSonus. The hype pitches it as a killer app, as full-featured as the big boys but with the cutting edge thinking of a new product. It has accumulated some loyal converts among top-level engineers, but it’s fair to say it’s still gathering momentum in the wider audio world. However, having just hit its third stable release, it has surely come into its own as a standalone DAW.

choosing a daw: studio one

Pros

The creative workflow innovations are too abundant to list here. Features like Scatch Pads allow you to break a song into sections or arrangements that can be worked on individually, within the one song project, saving you space and time. Cool drag-and-drop arrangement features mean your song structure updates responsively — say, when you decide that cool bridge would actually make a far better outro. There’s an integrated project/mastering solution for handling full albums that automatically updates your mixes as you tweak them.

In terms of pure sound, the mixing window splits the difference between typical DAW workflow and features imitating an analog desk. I personally found it really pretty. And to sweeten the pie, PreSonus has cut deal with cool third-party developers, like Melodyne, to provide a suite of instruments and effects bundled with the software.

Searching for new converts, PreSonus have also made it easy to try and buy Studio One. There’s a demo version, a cheap “Artist” version, and attractive educational and cross-grade discounts. Even the full “Professional” version undercuts Cubase, Ableton Live, and Pro Tools.

Cons

The loop and sound libraries that ship with the program are frankly not as rich and deep as those provided with competitors. And while I personally like the single-window layout approach of Studio One, it’s not a format that plays nicely on a laptop. You’re gonna want a pretty large monitor to make the most of it.

What It’s Best At

A leading-edge solution that can handle every step of the creative process with a raft of slick innovations.

Ideal User

Musicians who want to get in on the ground floor with what may be tomorrow’s new standard DAW. Only time will tell.

 

Alex Wilson is a multi-instrumentalist, composer and producer from Sydney, Australia. He founded the post-rock band sleepmakeswaves, with which he has toured Asia, America, Europe and Australia. In his spare time he writes music for short films, produces bands and subsists on altogether too much coffee. Alex is the instructor of the upcoming Soundfly course, Ableton Live Clicks and Backing Tracks.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail this to someonePrint this page
DaveHow To Choose A DAW: 7 Of The Best DAWs For Every Musical Need

30 comments

Join the conversation
  • The Unknown Best - February 9, 2017 reply

    FL studio. That is all.

    Perellex Music - May 18, 2017 reply

    Yeah how can you not mention fl but have garage band on there???????

  • Douglas - February 10, 2017 reply

    Without SONAR on this list, it comes across a. It biased. Just sayin.

    Greg - May 17, 2017 reply

    Yep, SONAR is how I roll, it’s lack of inclusion speaks louder than words………

    Wookiee - May 18, 2017 reply

    Totally agree with you Douglas. But it seems they all like to over look a very good DAW,

    Shame on you Reverbnation

    Doug T - May 19, 2017 reply

    Agree totally, using Sonar platinum and love it.

    LHB/Back Road Studios

  • Douglas - February 10, 2017 reply

    Or a bit biased, if autocorrect has anything to do with it.

    Dave - February 10, 2017 reply

    There are several not on here that others have brought up, as well. All of which are really solid. We’ll need to work on a second version of this post soon!

  • Ryan - February 11, 2017 reply

    You left out Sony ACID!!!? lol No worries, software hasn’t been updated in years- but it does everything I need.

  • Paul - May 17, 2017 reply

    … how about REASON ?

  • Jeffrey Tveraas - May 17, 2017 reply

    Apple Logic Pro X is only $199.99 thru the Apple Store, not $299.99 as mentioned above. Otherwise a cogent overview of major DAW’s, thanks.

  • John - May 17, 2017 reply

    Of the three DAWs I have exposure to (GarageBand, Studio 1, ProTools) I think the assessments are fair. I own and use Studio 1 and found it super easy to set up and use. No HW keys. The free de-featured version gives you a really good feel for it and actually useful for simple things. After using the free version I bought the next level. It worked great with my older audio interface with no trouble. I use it on a desktop with 2 older monitors. I agree that the supplied loops and sounds are weak. They left me scavenging for some good basic roots drum loops to support my songwriting.

  • Rob - May 17, 2017 reply

    Thanks for taking the time to write this article. However I would disagree that Garage Band is simple. I found it to be very user-hostile and counter-intuitive, like all Apple software. I bought Logic, because a couple of people recommended it, but I consider that a mistake. There are some good things about it, but editing is very difficult. Most aspects of Logic are counter-intuitive, like all Apple software these days. 15 years ago, Apple software was user-friendly. Now it’s the opposite. And there is no manual. The “Help”, like all Apple help, is not local to your computer, so you have to go online to access it. Most people don’t want their DAW online while working. But why bother? Apple “Help” is worthless. I had to buy a book by a third party to figure out how to use the software. I keep saying I’m going to switch to Reaper, but after spending $200 on Logic, I hate to admit I wasted my money.

  • Ian Graham - May 17, 2017 reply

    I would love to know what PT’s has over Logic in audio editing as I seriously keep reading this yet have not been shown where it’s “better”. There are some areas in Logic that perhaps need to be “clicked on” in preferences (fade tool/marquee click zones), but after 9 years of using Logic, not seen a problem.

  • Martin - May 17, 2017 reply

    No Reason?

  • PierreG - May 17, 2017 reply

    Don’t forget to include Tracktion – Waveform next time out!

  • ED - May 18, 2017 reply

    Mixcraft Pro and Sonar should have been compared as well as Reason.

  • MR MICHAEL F TULK - May 18, 2017 reply

    I likes Audacity I does.

  • Juan Ortiz - May 18, 2017 reply

    I use audition CS6, good for my needs, does anyone feel the same?

  • yoshida - May 18, 2017 reply

    Comparisons table would be very much appreciated.

  • Wookiee - May 18, 2017 reply

    As always no mention of SONAR typical.

  • Thomas - May 18, 2017 reply

    Once again Sonar is not mentioned but garage band is simply because it’s an apple product. Hey Wookiee! I don’t know what is about most of these bloggers/writers have against Cakewalk but it’s obvious they have something against it. Sornar is above all the other DAWs here the most user friendly and as powerful as any.

  • Erick - May 18, 2017 reply

    Why is it no one ever mentions CAKEWALK SONAR…well established and very capable DAW with MIDI software powered by KORG. I’ve been using it for years but you wouldn’t know it even exists in articles like this. It’s been around a lot longer than Abelton Live for example and certainly it was around long before half the DAWs mentioned here. Can you explain why Cakewalk Sonar is always left out of DAW and MIDI recommendations?

  • Raees - May 18, 2017 reply

    Seriously? No FL Studio?
    They’ve been a big enough player in the space for long enough to have a mention at least.

    And out of all you’ve mentioned, it’s my favorite to work with for various reasons.

  • Jeremy - May 18, 2017 reply

    Agree that Sonar should have been listed. Missed the boat there. Used it for many years. And they left out Reason?!?!? Reason is very capable, and rock solid. Someone isn’t paying attention.

    I recently did a comparison of Ableton, Reason, Studio One and Protools. Protools is a memory hog. Unless you want the “industry standard status” and need that for some reason, all of these other options are very capable. Much depends on your approach. I landed on Studio One for studio recording, but still do special projects in Ableton and Reason as I have been using them for many years. Only reason I don’t use Sonar anymore is that it wasn’t cross platform for so long (Cakewalk missed the boat there), but this is apparently changing. But in the end it’s not the tools…. it’s the artist and the material!

  • Navee - May 19, 2017 reply

    Magix Samplitude Pro/Sequoia formerly SEK’D is definitely a contender. Propellerheads REASON has grown up as a DAW and can now play a lil with the big boys! Nuendo has the greater edge over Cubase but either or are the BEST at handling its native core VST technology. SAWStudio, though an older DAW is worth a mention…RADAR?!? …and there is also no reason Harrison Mixbus should not have a place in this setting. At the end of the day, they are all the same IF one uses third-party plugin techniques (I.e. placing a console strip emulator on each channel, etc.) while leaving native DAW effects untouched. It always boils down to “WHO” is behind the DAW console and “WHAT” knowledge they have about gain stage leveling to get the most of out emulated-hardware gone-software and signal processing. A professional can make the purpose of ANY DAW…however workflow and the ease thereof (I.e. how many mouse moves, clicks, dropdown windows, etc.) is the only difference between them. Professionals NEVER over process…less and subtle is the difference between a demonstration or commercial finish. Regardless of ANY DAW or analog system: it is the power of sales in purchases of composition completions that determine the actual worth at the very end of the day! No matter how great one’s setups, mixes, and masters are: if no one purchases them it does not qualify as anything great. There are plenty of records recorded on grand SSL and Neve consoles that sit comfortably in $1 bins…it gets no realer than that!

  • Phil - May 19, 2017 reply

    What about Digital Performer and Reason??
    Come on fellows!

  • Darrell - May 20, 2017 reply

    Sony (now Magix) Vegas has always been my go to. I can do both audio and video editing as well as mixing!

  • Gary Marshall Marucci - June 1, 2017 reply

    Sonar was probably one of the first daw recording platforms out there! ✔ In the beginning it ran under the name of Cakewalk, then changed to Sonar. It had built in sequencing options such as opening midi files & converting midi to audio. It’s editing capabilities were also excellent! There was nothing on the market like it for home & pro studios in a daw type recording platform! When pro tools came on the scene it was nothing more than a tape deck & mixer type of platform! Finally they started adding the same type of features as Sonar. Other daw’s followed. Seems to me that they do not give Sonar it’s due respect and place in the industry! My friend worked with Ray Charles who absolutely loved Sonar at the time! I have a good friend who makes & produces some excellent recordings with Sonar, he is the brother of (Chris McHugh) – Nashville drummer for Keith Urban & so many more! It’s always the pro tools Apple type of user platforms that you always here about from people! These are the same people that use iPhones & buy their coffee ☕ from Starbucks with their noses up in the air! (LOL!) I have had a lot of friends in the industry & have been involved with producers such as the late Chas Chandler. -(Jimmi Hendrix)- (The Animals)etc.. I believe it is always the person behind the gear & not the gear 100%. So far I have been able too manipulate any idea using Sonar! It’s time Sonar gets some due respect!😎✔

  • ErWi - June 6, 2017 reply

    I think the issue with Sonar is that it is not Mac compatible which sucks. I’ve been using it for years and now have lifetime Platinum updates but I want to get a Mac…not sure what to do. I think Sonar is awesome.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *